Book Blogger Confessions (7)

Jul 16, 2012 by Kt Clapsadl


This meme is hosted by Tiger from Tiger's All Consuming Books and Karen from For What It's Worth on the first and third Monday of each month.


This week's question:

What do we owe publishers and authors? 

I think that there should be a mutual respect between book bloggers and the authors/publishers. Accountability is important, so when you say you will do something, you had better do it. That being said, we do this for free because we love books. We aren't employed by the publishers, so I don't think they have too much of a right to demand anything. Yeah, maybe if you want to get those "free" books, you have to jump through their hoops, but honestly, if the publishers are demanding things, then I think it is time to take a step back and decided whether it is really worth it. Until the publishers start paying bloggers, it is a hobby even if some of us treat it like a 2nd or 3rd job, so I just don't think they should have the right to demand much of anything.

If we accept ARC’s do we “owe” anything to them or just an honest review to our followers? 

This is always been a sticky situation for me, and it has only been in the last 6 months that I've been able to accept the fact that I'm just not going to be able or even willing to read everything that is sent to me. I used to slog through everything that arrived on my doorstep whether I liked it or not in fear that the publishers would stop sending the books I did want if I didn't. However, that got old really fast and caused a really bad case of blogger burn out. So now, if a book arrives unsolicited, I only read it if it interests me, otherwise I try and pass it on to another blogger/reader or donate it to my local library. Now, as for the books that I request, I make every effort to read and review them as I did commit to the publisher/author. (Getting back to the accountability issue here.) Of course sometimes even with the requested books, things will just not turn out how I hoped, and I have to decline to review it since I couldn't finish it. Although this happens so rarely on books that I have requested, that it hasn't been an issue. 

As book bloggers are we obligated to do more than just review books? Post covers – participate in book tours – host guest posts - promote authors?

Again, I don't think bloggers are really obligated to do anything, even review books. I think everyone's site should be what they want it to be, letting their own personality shine. It's your blog, make it what you want it, not what you think it should be to be "acceptable."

Comments (12)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I agree with you. Blogging is a hobby for almost all of us. We read because we love books. We write about the books we love. I do try to read all the books that I request. I seldom receive unsolicited books but don't feel obligated to read the ones that do arrive unless they appeal to me. I also try to pass the ones I won't read along to other readers who might like them. My BBC post is here.
1 reply · active 668 weeks ago
I actually receive a great deal of unsolicited books that I just can't keep up with. I also cannot afford to pay the shipping to keep giving them all away, so the ones I can't get to wind up at my local library. (Finished copies only of course.) At least then someone will get to enjoy them.
julie@my5monkeys's avatar

julie@my5monkeys · 668 weeks ago

totally nodding my head in agreement. Its a hobby and we should enjoy it and when it feels like a job, it that just that a job. If I ask for the book , then I should review it.
1 reply · active 668 weeks ago
This hobby can be to be a little overwhelming at times, but I wouldn't trade it for the world.
You made so many great points here.

I agree - if you're jumping through hoops just to get a free book you really need to take a look at yourself and your reasons for blogging.

I feel an obligation to review any book I've requested but it they are unsolicited ARC's I wouldn't feel the need to review them. Passing them on to another interested blogger seems like the perfect solution.
1 reply · active 668 weeks ago
Hoops suck. Enough said.

Yes, I always try and pass on ARCs that I'm not interested in, but the finished copies usually wind up at the library. I'm actually looking for an associate reviewer to help tackle some of these books. I just need some one to bite. lol
You can only do so much, and with our real lives being a priority, you cannot read every single book sometimes. Actually, rarely ever. You do what you can, and I like what you said: if you can't read or it don't find it interesting or engaging, pass it on.
1 reply · active 668 weeks ago
You are definitely right. For book lovers like us, we are certainly contented and happy with what we are doing. We love to share books and our reviews and that makes us happy. Great post!
1 reply · active 668 weeks ago
Definitely interesting questions... By my way of thinking, if I am offered and accept an ARC, it means two things. One, the publisher or author is agreeing to the terms that I have set down (which are listed in my blog, and on the e-galley sites that I'm a member of), and I'm agreeing to do my best to read the book from beginning to end and to give the book a little publicity. I don't owe anyone a positive review, and I won't write one if I didn't enjoy the book. I won't even refrain from writing a bad review - if I didn't like it, I'm going to say why. The reviewer/publisher relationship is a 2-way street, and they're perfectly within their rights to say, "No ARCs for you," if they don't like the rules that I work by.

I do try to at least link each book I receive to a purchasing site, or the publisher's/author's website, even if I didn't like the book, and even if it turns out that I won't be able to get around to reviewing it. I'm not doing this for attention or to get affiliate money through Amazon. That's my way of giving publicity to the book and giving people a chance to purchase it if they think they might like it, even if I can't write a full review for it in the end. I don't figure I'm obligated to do that, but in the spirit of the relationship, and knowing that I'm getting ARCs in the hope that what I say might lead to a sale, I figure it's a good thing to do.

But what I do I do as a hobby, because I enjoy it, and I refuse to let anybody dictate to me how my hobby ought to be run. If they don't like it, then they don't have to associate with me. Nobody's forcing their hand. If tomorrow, every single publisher got ahold of this comment and decided, "Well, I don't like that attitude and am not going to give her any more books," would I stop reviewing? Hell no! I've got enough books that I could probably write two reviews a week for the next three years before I even really start reaching the end of the list, and that's assuming that I never buy or borrow another book in the meantime. It wouldn't remove my ability to read, write, or have opinions, and I'd keep blogging. I'll do my best to review what I've been given, but since this is my hobby and not my job, sometimes I don't always get around to it. I feel bad when that happens, but I never promised anything other than doing my best to get the book read and reviewed.
My recent post Insurgent, by Veronica Roth
1 reply · active 668 weeks ago
Exactly! I couldn't have said it better myself. We all do the best we can, but in the end this is for our own enjoyment, not employment.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Amazon Reviews Subscribe to RSS Facebook Friend me on Goodreads Email me